Bufete de Abogados Manuel Díaz

Equipo

Equipo

Equipo

Conoce a los expertos comprometidos con ofrecer soluciones legales

Conoce a los expertos comprometidos con ofrecer soluciones legales
Total Settlement $1,575,000

Workplace – Wrongful Death

Total Settlement $1,575,000

Workplace – Wrongful Death

Total Settlement $1,575,000

Workplace – Wrongful Death

Total Settlement: $975,000

Commercial Motorcycle Death

Total Settlement: $975,000

Commercial Motorcycle Death

Total Settlement: $975,000

Commercial Motorcycle Death

Total Settlement: $260,000

Car Accident

Total Settlement: $260,000

Car Accident

Total Settlement: $260,000

Car Accident

Total Settlement: $215,000

18-wheeler Accident

Total Settlement: $215,000

18-wheeler Accident

Total Settlement: $215,000

18-wheeler Accident

Total Settlement: $130,000

Car Accident

Total Settlement: $130,000

Car Accident

Total Settlement: $130,000

Car Accident

Total Settlement: $100,000

Car accident

Total Settlement: $100,000

Car accident

Total Settlement: $100,000

Car accident

Total Settlement: $75,000

Slip and Fall at a Store

Total Settlement: $75,000

Slip and Fall at a Store

Total Settlement: $75,000

Slip and Fall at a Store

LEE MÁS OPINIONES

LEE MÁS OPINIONES

LEE MÁS OPINIONES

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Criminal Defense

Criminal Defense
Misdemeanors:
Misdemeanors:
Theft :

State of Texas v. D.S.

Dismissed

Theft :

State of Texas v. D.S.

Dismissed

Theft :

State of Texas v. D.S.

Dismissed

DWI :

State of Texas v. E.M.

Dismissed

DWI :

State of Texas v. E.M.

Dismissed

DWI :

State of Texas v. E.M.

Dismissed

Theft :

State of Texas v. J.G.

Dismissed

Theft :

State of Texas v. J.G.

Dismissed

Theft :

State of Texas v. J.G.

Dismissed

Terroristic Threat :

State of Texas v. D.D.

Dismissed

Terroristic Threat :

State of Texas v. D.D.

Dismissed

Terroristic Threat :

State of Texas v. D.D.

Dismissed

Evading Arrest :

State of Texas v. D.R.

Dismissed

Evading Arrest :

State of Texas v. D.R.

Dismissed

Evading Arrest :

State of Texas v. D.R.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. A.P.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. A.P.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. A.P.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. Y.P.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. Y.P.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. Y.P.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. B.D.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. B.D.

Dismissed

Assault Family Violence :

State of Texas v. B.D.

Dismissed

Resisting Arrest :

State of Texas v. A.S.

Dismissed

Resisting Arrest :

State of Texas v. A.S.

Dismissed

Resisting Arrest :

State of Texas v. A.S.

Dismissed

Assault Bodily Injury :

State of Texas v. S.T.

Dismissed

Assault Bodily Injury :

State of Texas v. S.T.

Dismissed

Assault Bodily Injury :

State of Texas v. S.T.

Dismissed

Deadly Conduct :

State of Texas v. J.C.

Dismissed

Deadly Conduct :

State of Texas v. J.C.

Dismissed

Deadly Conduct :

State of Texas v. J.C.

Dismissed

Felonies:
Felonies:
Capital Murder :

State of Texas v. R.R.

Reduced to Robbery w/Probation

Capital Murder :

State of Texas v. R.R.

Reduced to Robbery w/Probation

Capital Murder :

State of Texas v. R.R.

Reduced to Robbery w/Probation

First Degree Murder :

State of Texas v. B.E.

Dismissed

First Degree Murder :

State of Texas v. B.E.

Dismissed

First Degree Murder :

State of Texas v. B.E.

Dismissed

Injury to a Child :

State of Texas v. Y.P.

Dismissed

Injury to a Child :

State of Texas v. Y.P.

Dismissed

Injury to a Child :

State of Texas v. Y.P.

Dismissed

Felony D.W.I :

State of Texas v. M.M.

Dismissed

Felony D.W.I :

State of Texas v. M.M.

Dismissed

Felony D.W.I :

State of Texas v. M.M.

Dismissed

Aggravated Sexual Assault :

State of Texas v. A.R.

Dismissed

Aggravated Sexual Assault :

State of Texas v. A.R.

Dismissed

Aggravated Sexual Assault :

State of Texas v. A.R.

Dismissed

Felony Theft :

State of Texas v. L.G.

Dismissed

Felony Theft :

State of Texas v. L.G.

Dismissed

Felony Theft :

State of Texas v. L.G.

Dismissed

Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. J.S.

Dismissed

Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. J.S.

Dismissed

Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. J.S.

Dismissed

Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. J.A.

Dismissed

Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. J.A.

Dismissed

Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. J.A.

Dismissed

Assault/Impeding Circulation :

State of Texas v. M.M.

Not Guilty after trial

Assault/Impeding Circulation :

State of Texas v. M.M.

Not Guilty after trial

Assault/Impeding Circulation :

State of Texas v. M.M.

Not Guilty after trial

Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. H.H.

Not Guilty after trial

Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. H.H.

Not Guilty after trial

Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. H.H.

Not Guilty after trial

Felony DWI :

State of Texas v. J.S.

Dismissed

Felony DWI :

State of Texas v. J.S.

Dismissed

Felony DWI :

State of Texas v. J.S.

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. B.H.

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. B.H.

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. B.H.

Dismissed

3x Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. J.G.

Dismissed

3x Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. J.G.

Dismissed

3x Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon :

State of Texas v. J.G.

Dismissed

Two counts of Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. R.H.

Dismissed

Two counts of Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. R.H.

Dismissed

Two counts of Indecency with a Child :

State of Texas v. R.H.

Dismissed

Learn More About Criminal Defense Assistance

Learn More About Criminal Defense Assistance

Learn More About Criminal Defense Assistance

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Civil Law

Civil Law
Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

Client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

Client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

Client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

The client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

The client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

The client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

The client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

The client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Civil Defense Litigation:

Dismissed

The client doesn't have to pay damages to plaintiff

Demand Letter

Obtained $40,000 payment for client.

Demand Letter

Obtained $40,000 payment for client.

Demand Letter

Obtained $40,000 payment for client.

Notice of Unpaid Account

Obtained $16,000 payment for client.

Notice of Unpaid Account

Obtained $16,000 payment for client.

Notice of Unpaid Account

Obtained $16,000 payment for client.

Civil Defense Litigation

Appealed eviction

The client was able to keep possession of her home.

Civil Defense Litigation

Appealed eviction

The client was able to keep possession of her home.

Civil Defense Litigation

Appealed eviction

The client was able to keep possession of her home.

H.S: Civil Defense Litigation

Argued and won on a motion to dismiss

Suit against the client was dismissed and the client does not have to pay damages to plaintiff

H.S: Civil Defense Litigation

Argued and won on a motion to dismiss

Suit against the client was dismissed and the client does not have to pay damages to plaintiff

H.S: Civil Defense Litigation

Argued and won on a motion to dismiss

Suit against the client was dismissed and the client does not have to pay damages to plaintiff

Learn More About Civil Law Assistance

Learn More About Civil Law Assistance

Learn More About Civil Law Assistance

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Immigration

Immigration
EOIR: (Immigration Court)
EOIR: (Immigration Court)
42A Application for Cancellation of Removal for LPR

Approved & Granted

42A Application for Cancellation of Removal for LPR

Approved & Granted

42A Application for Cancellation of Removal for LPR

Approved & Granted

42B Application for Cancellation of Removal

Approved & Granted

42B Application for Cancellation of Removal

Approved & Granted

42B Application for Cancellation of Removal

Approved & Granted

Application for LPR Under the Cuban Adjustment Act

Approved & Granted

Application for LPR Under the Cuban Adjustment Act

Approved & Granted

Application for LPR Under the Cuban Adjustment Act

Approved & Granted

Immigration Bond Hearing

Approved & Granted

Immigration Bond Hearing

Approved & Granted

Immigration Bond Hearing

Approved & Granted

USCIS:
USCIS:
TN Visa and & Visa extension

Approved & Granted

TN Visa and & Visa extension

Approved & Granted

TN Visa and & Visa extension

Approved & Granted

N-400 Application for Naturalization

Approved & Granted

N-400 Application for Naturalization

Approved & Granted

N-400 Application for Naturalization

Approved & Granted

K.R DACA Renewal Approved.

Approved & Granted

K.R DACA Renewal Approved.

Approved & Granted

K.R DACA Renewal Approved.

Approved & Granted

Learn More About Immigration Assistance

Learn More About Immigration Assistance

Learn More About Immigration Assistance

Recent Victories

Family Law

CPS

J.H v. B.C. & B.H.

Client’s children were removed in 2015 by CPS and placed in foster care. We were able to have the children back with their parents and CPS is no longer involved.

Custody

M.A v. M.S.

Client came to us after his 14-Year-Old daughter expressed she was afraid of moms' new boyfriend. We got our client primary custody for his daughter.

Custody

A.R v. A.P.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client for 4 years. After a temporary Order hearing, the Judge ordered reunification counseling and our client has 1,3, 5th-weekend visits.

Divorce

J.M v. M.M.

Opposing party sought a protective order against the client alleging family violence. We were able to defend the allegation and the court found no family violence, denying the prosecutor's motion.

Custody

L.A. v. D.A.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client. We obtained temporary primary conservatorship for our client and supervised visitation for the opposing party and custody evaluation.

Divorce

S.G. v. R.G.

Opposing party denied access to the client for more than a year and would not respond to our client’s communications and requests to see the kids. We were able to secure temporary primary conservatorship to the client, supervised exchanges to the opposing party, and a custody evaluation.

Learn More About Family Law Assistance

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Family Law

CPS

J.H v. B.C. & B.H.

Client’s children were removed in 2015 by CPS and placed in foster care. We were able to have the children back with their parents and CPS is no longer involved.

CPS

J.H v. B.C. & B.H.

Client’s children were removed in 2015 by CPS and placed in foster care. We were able to have the children back with their parents and CPS is no longer involved.

Custody

M.A v. M.S.

Client came to us after his 14-Year-Old daughter expressed she was afraid of moms' new boyfriend. We got our client primary custody for his daughter.

Custody

M.A v. M.S.

Client came to us after his 14-Year-Old daughter expressed she was afraid of moms' new boyfriend. We got our client primary custody for his daughter.

Custody

A.R v. A.P.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client for 4 years. After a temporary Order hearing, the Judge ordered reunification counseling and our client has 1,3, 5th-weekend visits.

Custody

A.R v. A.P.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client for 4 years. After a temporary Order hearing, the Judge ordered reunification counseling and our client has 1,3, 5th-weekend visits.

Divorce

J.M v. M.M.

Opposing party sought a protective order against the client alleging family violence. We were able to defend the allegation and the court found no family violence, denying the prosecutor's motion.

Divorce

J.M v. M.M.

Opposing party sought a protective order against the client alleging family violence. We were able to defend the allegation and the court found no family violence, denying the prosecutor's motion.

Custody

L.A. v. D.A.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client. We obtained temporary primary conservatorship for our client and supervised visitation for the opposing party and custody evaluation.

Custody

L.A. v. D.A.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client. We obtained temporary primary conservatorship for our client and supervised visitation for the opposing party and custody evaluation.

Divorce

S.G. v. R.G.

Opposing party denied access to the client for more than a year and would not respond to our client’s communications and requests to see the kids. We were able to secure temporary primary conservatorship to the client, supervised exchanges to the opposing party, and a custody evaluation.

Divorce

S.G. v. R.G.

Opposing party denied access to the client for more than a year and would not respond to our client’s communications and requests to see the kids. We were able to secure temporary primary conservatorship to the client, supervised exchanges to the opposing party, and a custody evaluation.

Learn More About Family Law Assistance

Learn More About Family Law Assistance

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Family Law

CPS

J.H v. B.C. & B.H.

Client’s children were removed in 2015 by CPS and placed in foster care. We were able to have the children back with their parents and CPS is no longer involved.

CPS

J.H v. B.C. & B.H.

Client’s children were removed in 2015 by CPS and placed in foster care. We were able to have the children back with their parents and CPS is no longer involved.

Custody

M.A v. M.S.

Client came to us after his 14-Year-Old daughter expressed she was afraid of moms' new boyfriend. We got our client primary custody for his daughter.

Custody

M.A v. M.S.

Client came to us after his 14-Year-Old daughter expressed she was afraid of moms' new boyfriend. We got our client primary custody for his daughter.

Custody

A.R v. A.P.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client for 4 years. After a temporary Order hearing, the Judge ordered reunification counseling and our client has 1,3, 5th-weekend visits.

Custody

A.R v. A.P.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client for 4 years. After a temporary Order hearing, the Judge ordered reunification counseling and our client has 1,3, 5th-weekend visits.

Divorce

J.M v. M.M.

Opposing party sought a protective order against the client alleging family violence. We were able to defend the allegation and the court found no family violence, denying the prosecutor's motion.

Divorce

J.M v. M.M.

Opposing party sought a protective order against the client alleging family violence. We were able to defend the allegation and the court found no family violence, denying the prosecutor's motion.

Custody

L.A. v. D.A.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client. We obtained temporary primary conservatorship for our client and supervised visitation for the opposing party and custody evaluation.

Custody

L.A. v. D.A.

Opposing party was denying possession and access of the child to our client. We obtained temporary primary conservatorship for our client and supervised visitation for the opposing party and custody evaluation.

Divorce

S.G. v. R.G.

Opposing party denied access to the client for more than a year and would not respond to our client’s communications and requests to see the kids. We were able to secure temporary primary conservatorship to the client, supervised exchanges to the opposing party, and a custody evaluation.

Divorce

S.G. v. R.G.

Opposing party denied access to the client for more than a year and would not respond to our client’s communications and requests to see the kids. We were able to secure temporary primary conservatorship to the client, supervised exchanges to the opposing party, and a custody evaluation.

Learn More About Family Law Assistance

Learn More About Family Law Assistance

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Recent Victories

Federal Law

Federal Law
Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine:

The US District Court for the NDT v. L.F.

Dismissed

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine:

The US District Court for the NDT v. L.F.

Dismissed

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine:

The US District Court for the NDT v. L.F.

Dismissed

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine:

The US District Court for the NDT v. R.B

Sentenced reduced from 188 months to 57 months

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine:

The US District Court for the NDT v. R.B

Sentenced reduced from 188 months to 57 months

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine:

The US District Court for the NDT v. R.B

Sentenced reduced from 188 months to 57 months

Illegal Re-Entry:

The US District Court for the SDT v. V.H.

Sentence reduced from 12 months to 69 days

Illegal Re-Entry:

The US District Court for the SDT v. V.H.

Sentence reduced from 12 months to 69 days

Illegal Re-Entry:

The US District Court for the SDT v. V.H.

Sentence reduced from 12 months to 69 days

Conspiracy to Transport and Move, Undocumented Alien Within the US:

The US District Court for the SDT v. I.D.

3 Counts reduced to 1, Sentence reduced to 15 months

Conspiracy to Transport and Move, Undocumented Alien Within the US:

The US District Court for the SDT v. I.D.

3 Counts reduced to 1, Sentence reduced to 15 months

Conspiracy to Transport and Move, Undocumented Alien Within the US:

The US District Court for the SDT v. I.D.

3 Counts reduced to 1, Sentence reduced to 15 months

Learn More About Federal Law Assistance

Learn More About Federal Law Assistance

Learn More About Federal Law Assistance

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.